Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 02.07.2025 01:47

All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Exclusive | Longevity Is Now a Factor When Picking an Embryo for IVF - WSJ
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Thank you.
Angelina Jolie And Brad Pitt’s Daughter Shiloh Reintroduces Herself With New Name - HuffPost
Let’s just make it real clear:
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Plug Power Stock Is Heating Up On Short Squeeze Hopes. Should You Buy PLUG Here? - Barchart.com
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Liquid Glass is more than skin deep on macOS Tahoe - AppleInsider
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
What’s next?
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
What are the top 5 star Michelin restaurants near Pompano Beach, Florida?
Just in the last 5 years:
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Why do I keep waking up at 4 AM?
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Russia can stop this any time.
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Scientists Solve Decades-Old Cell Biology Mystery - SciTechDaily